Skip to main content

Table 3 Profits and losses made from the sale of antiretroviral drugs to low income countries

From: Antiretrovirals for low income countries: an analysis of the commercial viability of a highly competitive market

Formulation and defined daily dose

2010

2012

 

Me-dian price

Lowest API cost quoted to WHO

Total production cost

Profit or loss at API cost

Me-dian price

Lowest API cost quoted to WHO

Total production cost

Profit or loss at API cost

    

quoted to WHO

20%

40%

60%

   

quoted to WHO

20%

40%

60%

     

less

less

less

    

less

less

less

1) Scenario “Indian manufacturers”

              

Three drug combination tablets

              

[lamivudine 150 mg + stavudine 30 mg + nevirapine 200 mg], b.i.d

63

37

78

−15

−2

11

25

57

39

81

−28

−10

4

18

[lamivudine 150 mg + zidovudine 300 mg + nevirapine 200 mg] b.i.d.

131

87

166

−4

−4

27

58

119

90

171

−53

−21

11

43

[lamivudine 300 mg + tenofovir 300 mg + efavirenz 600 mg] q.d.

192

126

230

−38

7

52

97

162

102

187

−25

11

47

84

[emtricitabine 200 mg + tenofovir 300 mg + efavirenz 600 mg] q.d.

242

136

243

−1

47

94

142

186

126

224

−38

6

50

93

Two drug combination tablets

              

[lamivudine 150 mg + stavudine 30 mg] b.i.d.

39

24

54

−15

−7

2

10

36

24

55

−19

−10

−1

7

[lamivudine 150 mg + zidovudine 300 mg] b.i.d.

101

73

142

−41

−23

3

30

94

75

145

−51

−25

2

29

[lamivudine 300 mg + tenofovir 300 mg] q.d.

109

71

133

−24

2

27

52

65

58

109

−44

−23

−3

18

[emtricitabine 200 mg + tenofovir 300 mg ] q.d.

143

78

145

−2

26

54

82

87

73

136

−49

−23

3

29

[lopinavir 200 mg + ritonavir 50 mg], 4 tablets/day

433

405

745

−313

−169

−24

121

359

314

583

−223

−112

0

112

Single drug formulations

              

[efavirenz 600 mg] q.d.

56

55

103

−47

−28

−8

11

46

44

84

−37

−22

−6

9

[nevirapine 200 mg] b.i.d.

31

13

35

−4

1

6

10

30

16

40

−10

−5

1

7

[zidovudine 300 mg] b.i.d

88

57

113

−25

−5

15

36

82

59

117

−35

−14

8

29

[didanosine 250 mg] b.i.d

159

52

105

54

73

92

110

165

55

109

55

75

94

114

Summary

              

Column total

1787

1214

2292

−475

−82

351

784

1488

1074

2041

−557

−173

210

592

Arithmetic mean profit margin (%)

   

−27

−5

20

44

   

−37

−12

14

40

Decrease in profit margin between 2010 and 2012 (%)

          

11

7

6

4

Average decrease in profit margin across sensitivity analysis outcomes (%)

          

7

   

2) Scenario “Publicly owned producer”

              

Three drug combination tablets

              

[lamivudine 150 mg + stavudine 30 mg + nevirapine 200 mg], b.i.d

63

37

91

−28

−21

−13

−6

57

38.8

92

−35

−27

−20

−12

[lamivudine 150 mg + zidovudine 300 mg + nevirapine 200 mg] b.i.d.

131

87

140

−9

8

26

43

119

89.6

143

−24

−6

12

30

[lamivudine 300 mg + tenofovir 300 mg + efavirenz 600 mg] q.d.

192

126

153

40

65

90

115

162

102

128

34

54

74

95

[emtricitabine 200 mg + tenofovir 300 mg + efavirenz 600 mg] q.d.

242

136

159

83

109

136

162

186

126

149

37

62

86

111

Two drug combination tablets

              

[lamivudine 150 mg + stavudine 30 mg] b.i.d.

39

24

77

−38

−33

−29

−24

36

24

77

−42

−37

−32

−27

[lamivudine 150 mg + zidovudine 300 mg] b.i.d.

101

73

127

−25

−18

−3

11

94

75

128

−34

−19

−4

11

[lamivudine 300 mg + tenofovir 300 mg] q.d.

109

71

98

11

25

40

54

65

58

85

−19

−8

4

15

[emtricitabine 200 mg + tenofovir 300 mg] q.d.

143

78

105

38

54

70

85

87

73

99

−13

2

16

31

[lopinavir 200 mg + ritonavir 50 mg], 4 tablets/day

433

405

512

−79

2

83

164

359

314

374

−14

48

111

174

Single drug formulations

              

[efavirenz 600 mg] q.d.

56

55

81

−25

−14

−3

7

46

44

70

−24

−15

−6

2

[nevirapine 200 mg] b.i.d.

31

13

66

−35

−33

−30

−27

30

16

69

−40

−36

−33

−30

[zidovudine 300 mg] b.i.d

88

57

110

−22

−11

0

12

82

59

112

−30

−18

−6

5

[didanosine 250 mg] b.i.d

159

52

106

54

64

75

85

165

55

108

57

67

78

89

Summary

              

Column total

1787

1214

1825

−35

197

442

681

1488

1074

1634

−147

67

281

494

Arithmetic mean profit margin (%)

   

−2

11

25

38

   

−10

4

19

33

Decrease in profit margin between 2010 and 2012 (%)

          

8

7

6

5

Average decrease in profit margin across sensitivity analysis outcomes (%)

          

6

   
  1. (amounts in whole $US per person-year).