Skip to main content

Table 4 Posterior density of the measure of Regulatory Infrastructure and Good Practices

From: Global pharmaceutical regulation: the challenge of integration for developing states

 

Item discrimination

Item difficulty

GMP requirements are published by the government (5.05.03)

1.89

0.08

(0.72)

(0.30)

MRA uses a computerized information management system (5.01.15)

1.67

0.61

(0.60)

(0.30)

Government publishes National Good Pharmacy Practice Guidelines (5.05.11)

1.50

−0.84

(0.57)

(0.31)

Government publishes National Good Distribution Practice Guidelines (5.05.07)

1.23

−0.76

(0.46)

(0.27)

An MRA exists (5.01.02)

1.20

1.34

(0.42)

(0.32)

Legal provisions establish the power and responsibilities of the MRA (5.01.01)

1.14

1.38

(0.39)

(0.31)

Whistle-blowing mechanism for the pharmaceutical sector (3.01.16)

0.95

0.04

(0.32)

(0.20)

A national medicines policy official document exists (3.01.04)

0.77

0.78

(0.28)

(0.20)

Declaration of potential conflict of interests of experts (5.02.15S)

0.75

−0.25

(0.27)

(0.18)

MRA gets funds from regular government budget (5.01.11)

0.66

0.77

(0.26)

(0.20)

Policy exists to manage and sanction conflict of interest (3.01.14)

0.56

−0.45

(0.23)

(0.17)

An assessment of the regulatory system was conducted within last five years (5.01.10)

0.51

0.56

(0.23)

(0.17)

Pharmaceutical policy implementation is being regularly monitored (3.01.12)

0.45

−0.06

(0.21)

(0.16)

MRA is a semi autonomous agency (5.01.04.02)

0.36

−0.71

(0.23)

(0.17)

  1. Notes: Entries without parentheses are posterior means and entries with parentheses are posterior standard deviations. The parameters were estimated using the MCMCmixfactanal in the MCMCpack in R3.1.2. Items are ordered by the degree of discrimination. Estimations with a significant portion of their posterior mass to the left of zero are in italic and placed last