Skip to main content

Table 2 The comparisons of adults’ distress and anxiety issues during the COVID-19 pandemic across studies

From: Typhoon eye effect versus ripple effect: the role of family size on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan

Measure

Sample description; data collection time

Prevalence

Comparison with this study

Source

Distress

This study

9.2%

–

 

Kessler-6

369 adults in China, Feb 20–21, 2020

6.2%

−3.0% (−6.3 to 0.6%)

χ2(1)=2.8, p = 0.10

[24]

Kessler-10

500 adults in Italy, April 10–13, 2020

18.6%

9.4% (5.5 to 13.3%)

χ2(1)=22.2, p < 0.0001

[3]

Kessler-6

1599 adults in China, Feb 1–4, 2020

Mean (SD): 7.7 (±7.7)

2.2% (1.49–2.8%)

T (2198) = 6.4, p < 0.0001

[25]

Kessler-6

2032 adults in the U.S., late April 2020

27.7%

18.5% (15.3 to 21.4%)

χ2(1)=88.3, p < 0.0001

[26]

Anxiety

This study

19.0%

–

 

GAD-2

3088 adults in 32 provinces of China, Feb 20–27, 2020

13.2%

−5.83% (− 2.6% to − 9.3%)

χ2(1)=13.9, p = 0.0002

[27]

GAD-2

3480 adults in Spain, March 21–27, 2020

21.6%

2.3% (− 1.3 to 5.5%)

χ2(1)=1.6, p = 0.21

[28]

GAD-7

103 adults in China, Feb 10–28, 2020

22.3%

3.3% (− 4.4 to 12.7%)

χ2(1)=0.6, p = 0.44

[29]

GAD-7

98 adults in Zhongshan, Guangdong in China, Feb 15–29, 2020

23.4%

4.4% (−3.6 to 14.1%)

χ2(1)=1.03, p = 0.31

[30]

GAD-7

4872 adults in China, Jan 31–Feb 2, 2020

22.6%

3.6% (.1–6.8%)

χ2(1)=4.0, p = .045

[31]

GAD-2

1577 adults in Wuhan, China, Feb 18–24, 2020

23.8%

4.8% (.9–8.5%)

χ2(1)=5.7, p = .017

[32]

GAD-7

1556 seniors older than 60 years in China

37.1%

18.1% (14.0–21.9%)

χ2(1)=65.2, p < .0001

[33]