Table 1 Summary profile of respondents’ agencies (n=57)
| Â | n | (%) |
|---|---|---|
Agency type | ||
 Academic institution | 34 | 60% |
 Government | 11 | 19% |
 Non-governmental organization | 4 | 7% |
 Inter-governmental organization | 3 | 5% |
 Private sector | 1 | 2% |
 Others | 4 | 7% |
Agency level (multiple responses allowed) | ||
 International | 40 | 70% |
 National | 38 | 67% |
 Provincial/ state | 21 | 37% |
 Local/ municipal | 28 | 49% |
 Community | 25 | 44% |
Work performed by organization (multiple responses allowed) | ||
 Research | 54 | 95% |
 Program development | 35 | 61% |
 Program implementation | 35 | 61% |
 Monitoring and evaluation | 31 | 54% |
 Risk assessment | 30 | 53% |
 Policy development | 28 | 49% |
 Others | 11 | 19% |
Agency serving which disaster phase (multiple responses allowed) | ||
 Prevention | 47 | 82% |
 Preparedness | 54 | 95% |
 Readiness | 45 | 79% |
 Response | 45 | 79% |
 Recovery | 39 | 68% |
Location where respondent based | ||
 Japan | 5 |  |
 UK | 4 |  |
 US | 3 |  |
 Australia, Philippines | 2 |  |
 China, Bahamas, Denmark, France, Ghana, Italy, Malaysia, Nepal, Netherlands, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand | 1 |  |